| Bookmaker | Sunderland | Draw | Chelsea | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket Polymarket prediction market | 3.51 (28¢) | 3.92 (26¢) | ★ 2.15 (46¢) | Trade on Polymarket |
1xBet | ★ 3.56 | 3.85 | 2.04 | |
888sport | 3.30 | 3.60 | 2.00 | |
Betfair | 3.50 | ★ 4.00 | 2.12 | |
Betsson | 3.45 | 3.80 | 2.05 | |
Coolbet | 3.50 | 3.92 | 2.08 | |
Everygame | 3.35 | 3.75 | 2.05 | |
GTbets | 3.41 | 3.68 | 2.05 | |
Marathon Bet | 3.54 | 3.75 | 2.07 | |
Matchbook | 3.55 | ★ 4.00 | 2.12 | |
MyBookie.ag | 3.44 | 3.75 | 1.99 | |
Nordic Bet | 3.45 | 3.80 | 2.05 | |
Pinnacle | 3.47 | 3.83 | 2.09 | |
William Hill | 3.30 | 3.60 | 2.00 |
★ Best available price in column
| Bookmaker | Sunderland | Chelsea | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
1xBet | 02.65 | 01.53 | |
Coolbet | +11.44 | −12.95 | |
GTbets | +0.51.78 | −0.52.01 | |
Matchbook | +0.51.87 | −0.52.12 | |
MyBookie.ag | +0.51.75 | −0.52.00 | |
Pinnacle | +0.51.84 | −0.52.10 |
| Bookmaker | Over | Under | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
1xBet | 2.51.80 | 2.52.10 | |
Betsson | 2.51.72 | 2.52.12 | |
Coolbet | 2.51.76 | 2.52.14 | |
GTbets | 2.51.78 | 2.52.03 | |
MyBookie.ag | 2.51.70 | 2.52.07 | |
Nordic Bet | 2.51.72 | 2.52.12 | |
Pinnacle | 2.751.96 | 2.751.94 | |
William Hill | 2.51.73 | 2.52.05 |
Sunderland will host Chelsea on May 24th in an English Premier League encounter. This late-season fixture carries significance as both sides look to solidify their standings or pursue final objectives before the campaign concludes. The match represents a chance for each team to demonstrate where they stand in the competitive EPL landscape.
Bookmaker consensus across the market suggests an even matchup, with all three outcomes viewed as genuinely plausible. While Chelsea holds historical advantages and typically carries expectations as an established top-tier side, the consensus reflects that Sunderland possesses sufficient quality to compete effectively at home. Notably, a draw emerges as a meaningful possibility rather than an outlying outcome, indicating that forecasters see paths for both sides to earn a result without determining a clear winner.
Polymarket pricing data was unavailable at the time of assessment, so direct comparison between traditional bookmaker sentiment and decentralized market views cannot be made. Without this additional perspective, we cannot determine whether alternative forecasting mechanisms would broadly validate or diverge from the conventional consensus.
Given the absence of meaningful divergence data, the gap between major forecasting approaches cannot be meaningfully quantified. This absence of notable disagreement across accessible sources suggests relatively consolidated expectations heading into the fixture, though localized variations between individual bookmakers may still exist.
It is important to note that this overview reflects market pricing as it stood at the time of writing. Odds and sentiment can shift substantially in the days before kickoff based on team news, injury developments, and emerging information. Those tracking this matchup should monitor for late updates that could alter how the market reassesses the three possible outcomes.
This data reflects market prices at the time of writing. Prices may shift before kickoff.